NEW YORK — In a politically charged standoff over police
oversight in the nation's biggest city, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said Wednesday
he'd veto a plan to put the New York Police Department under an outside watchdog's
scrutiny, calling it a threat to hard-won safety.
But City Council Speaker Christine Quinn – a frequent
Bloomberg ally who's been seen as likely to get his support to succeed him as
mayor next year – said she'd guarantee a veto override if needed to create an
inspector general for police, a proposal fueled by criticism of the police
department's widespread use of the tactic known as stop and frisk and its
surveillance of Muslims, spying revealed in a series of stories by The
Associated Press.
A day after Quinn signaled the measure would pass the
council after months in limbo, dividing lines were dug deeper over the plan,
which would install a monitor with the power to subpoena documents and
witnesses and the mandate to look at the procedures and policies of the
nation's biggest police department.
Bloomberg urged lawmakers to oppose the plan, saying it
would usher in an era of second-guessing for a police force that has worked to
drive killings to record lows.
"Make no mistake about it: This bill jeopardizes that
progress and will put the lives of New Yorkers and our police cops at
risk," he said at the opening of a computer data center in a downtown
high-rise – an example, he said, of economic activity flourishing in a city
seen as safe. "...We cannot afford to play election-year politics with the
safety of our city."
Quinn, however, said there was "absolutely no
validity" to suggesting that more monitoring would compromise
crime-fighting. She argues that closer scrutiny could instead help policing by
building public confidence in cops.
"We have a situation right now in this city, whether we
like it or not, where some of the practices of the Police Department have
caused significant rifts between police and the community," she said at a
news conference.
Quinn and colleagues backing the inspector general proposal
reached an agreement on it Tuesday, positioning it to move toward a vote in the
coming weeks. Quinn said Wednesday that talks were continuing on other
proposals to set new rules surrounding stop and frisk: They would require cops
to explain why they are stopping people and would give people more latitude to
sue over stops they considered biased, among other provisions.
The developments come during a federal trial over the
department's use of stop and frisk, and they follow AP stories that revealed
how city police infiltrated Muslim student groups, put informants in mosques,
monitored sermons and otherwise spied on Muslims as part of a broad effort to
prevent terrorist attacks. Adding to the attention surrounding stop and frisk,
violent protests rocked a Brooklyn neighborhood last week after police stopped
a teen and ended up shooting him dead; they say he pulled out a gun.
Broached last year, the inspector general and stop-and-frisk
proposals have become heated issues in November's competitive mayoral election;
Bloomberg is term-limited.
Quinn, a top Democratic candidate, has faced pressure from
civil rights and minority advocates and from some of her Democratic rivals to
get the measures passed. One Democratic contender, Bill de Blasio, pressed the
need for an inspector general at a news conference Tuesday, before Quinn
announced lawmakers had agreed on it. Democrat Bill Thompson's campaign said
the former city comptroller also supports the idea.
But some other hopefuls are speaking out against the plan
for a monitor, including Democratic former Councilman Sal Albanese and
Republicans John Catsimatidis, a billionaire businessman, and Joseph Lhota, a
former chairman of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Former Bronx
Borough President Adolfo Carrion's campaign said the
Democrat-turned-independent, who's running on the Independence Party line and
seeking the GOP nomination, also opposes the IG idea.
Republican George McDonald, who runs an organization that
helps the homeless, is inclined to support the proposal but needs more details,
a spokesman said.
The NYPD has said its surveillance of Muslims is legal and
that stop and frisk has helped combat crime and save lives. The term refers to
the police practice of stopping, questioning and sometimes patting down people
who are seen as acting suspiciously but who don't necessarily meet the
probable-cause standard for arrest.
Many government agencies, including the FBI and CIA, have
inspectors general, or officials with investigative powers to explore conduct
within the agency. So do the Los Angeles Police Department and other forces.
Civil rights advocates say the NYPD should, too. The
inspector general would be housed within the city's Department of Investigation,
which performs that function for many other city agencies.
Efforts to establish outside watchdogs for the NYPD go back
decades. Voters in 1966 defeated a plan to put civilians on a board that
reviewed complaints about police; more than 20 years later, private citizens
ultimately were appointed to and now make up the Civilian Complaint Review
Board, which deals mainly with allegations of misconduct against individual
cops. A special commission that explored a 1990s police corruption scandal
recommended empowering an ongoing, independent board to investigate corruption;
a Commission to Combat Police Corruption was established in 1995, but it lacks
subpoena power.
The Police Department has its own 700-person Internal
Affairs Bureau that examines cops' conduct, and courts have exercised some
oversight, including through a 1985 federal court settlement that set
guidelines for the NYPD's intelligence-gathering.
Supporters say an inspector general would look more broadly
at police activities than the current agencies do. But Bloomberg said they
already provide robust monitoring and noted that prosecutors can pursue charges
against cops suspected of criminal misconduct.
The council proposal, he said, amounted to "a policy
supervisor" who could conflict with the police commissioner.
"There would be questions in the ranks of police cops
about who's really in charge and whose policies they should follow,"
Bloomberg said.
Quinn rebuffed those concerns, saying the inspector general
would issue reports and shine a light on the workings of the police department,
but not change policy.
Civil rights and police reform advocates said they were
pleased with the pact on the inspector general measure but were continuing to
press for the other measures. Police unions condemned the inspector general
idea as squandering resources on red tape, and the police department said it
gets plenty of oversight.