The Fairfax County Police are out of control and need oversight but are slick enough to organize "Campaign contributions" during election time to avoid it.

Group: More oversight could’ve stopped Ferrell shooting



CHARLOTTE, N.C. – After Saturday’s fatal shooting of an unarmed 24-year-old man by a Charlotte-Mecklenburg police officer, groups are calling for more CMPD oversight. 

The Citizens Review Board is an independent group that oversees complaints filed against the police department.  The 11 members are appointed by the mayor, city manager, and city council.  Recently, the board has been under fire for its lack of oversight and power.  

A Charlotte Observer investigation earlier this year found the board held only four hearings in its 15 years, and never ruled against the department.

“We're hoping that this incident of Saturday can be a flashpoint,” said Matt Newtown, spokesman for Citizens Review Board Reform Now.

Groups like the ACLU and Citizens Review Board Reform Now claim changes to the board could’ve made a difference in Saturday’s outcome. 

“We feel as though a stronger Citizens Review Board could've prevented something like that from happening, could've weeded out that particular cowboy.  And that didn't happen, “ said Newton.

Officer Randall Kerrick was arrested and charged with the voluntary manslaughter of Jonathan Ferrell.

Citizens Review Board Reform Now has called for more transparency, a lower standard of review, and subpoena powers for the CRB. 

Supporters of change have met with City Council over recent months about updating city policy regarding the CRB.

“We feel like we have been working tirelessly for 8 months to see to it that an incident like that would not occur,” said Newton.

Police oversight task force holds public meeting


As the Department of Justice continues to investigate APD, the city is turning to Burquenos for input.
City leaders are looking at ways to change the way complaints against officers are handled.
On Tuesday night, KOB Eyewitness News 4 was at a public comment meeting held by the police oversight task force. 
Only about 25 or 30 folks turned up to the meeting.
Most think cops aren't being held accountable by the current Police Oversight Commission, especially if they abuse citizens or use their guns when it's unwarranted.
Kayleen Chrisman attended the Tuesday night meeting. She works with Albuquerque's homeless, and life on the streets means her clients come in contact with APD officers often.
She hears things.
"Homeless individuals being arrested by police officers and also incarcerated and having their things taken from them and not returned," she said.
Chrisman admits it's hard to know if anything will be done if she complains about the treatment of people she cares about.
"I've had people in my life that have been homeless," she said.
Chrisman didn't stand up and speak at the comment session, but many others did.
"You have a unique opportunity here to set up a police oversight process that can be a model for the rest of the country," said one man.
But even the task force chairman admits there's a credibility issue.
"The process is flawed," said Andrew Lipman. "The public doesn't trust the Police Oversight Commission."
Lipman said they're struggling to lock down specifics on what needs to change.
KOB asked Lipman if the task force has heard any one complaint about the oversight system more often than others. 
"No," said Lipman. "It's more generalized. The system's broken."
Lipman said the task force has their work cut out for them. They have to make recommendations to the city council by December.
"We're in the first phase, which is gathering information," he said. "The second phase, we'll look at what kind of recommendations we can make to improve the system."
Chrisman hopes they get what they need to make a change.
"I just hope that we can see an end to this problem," she said.
The Tuesday night meeting was the second of three public meetings to address concerns about the APD Police Oversight Commission.
Lipman said the only way anything can get done before recommendations to the city council are due is for more people to come to the final meeting.

It's on October 17, and there's more information on the task force webpage, here:

LAPD civilian oversight board elects Steve Soboroff as its new president

LOS ANGELES — The Los Angeles Police Department's civilian oversight board has unanimously elected real estate developer Steve Soboroff as its president.
The newly composed Los Angeles Police Commission, which oversees the LAPD and sets its policies, met Tuesday. Four of its five members were recently appointed by Mayor Eric Garcetti. Robert Saltzman, a law professor, remains from the prior board.
New commission members include Paula Madison, a former journalist and media executive, who was elected Tuesday as its vice president; Sandra Figueroa-Villa, who heads a nonprofit community group; and Kathleen Kim, a law professor.
Soboroff said the commission intends to maintain and enhance reforms achieved by the department since federal oversight ended in May. He also pushed for the LAPD to adopt new technology such as lapel cameras within 18 months.


PRINCETON: police oversight

Mayor Liz Lempert cast the tie-breaking vote Monday to back a measure that gives the town’s municipal administrator the civilian oversight of the Princeton Police Department.

   Mayor Lempert, speaking prior to voting for the first time as mayor, expressed disappointment that the divided Princeton Council could not reach consensus on an issue that officials had been debating for a while.

   She and council members Bernard P. Miller, Lance Liverman and Heather H. Howard were against giving that oversight to the mayor and council. The ordinance they supported, one that puts that authority in the hands of the town administrator, needs to come up for a public hearing Sept. 23 and be followed by a vote to adopt it.

   The slender 4-3 margin of Monday’s decision was not a surprise, given the comments officials on both sides of the issue had been making headed into the council meeting. Some officials felt strongly that the council and the mayor should not abdicate their responsibility as the public’s representatives on a matter too critical to delegate to a municipal employee.

   Prior to casting her vote, Councilwoman Jo S. Butler said public safety is “the most important” function that municipal government provides. She expressed deep dissatisfaction with the amount of information-sharing going on about the police force, feeling access has been limited to a select few in government.
   She joined council members Jenny Crumiller and Patrick Simon in opposing the ordinance that makes Administrator Robert W. Bruschi the “appropriate authority,” as it is called.

   On the other hand, some officials felt it important to avoid politicizing the department and thought it made sense to have one person, namely Mr. Bruschi, be the civilian oversight instead of the mayor and the council.

   Councilwoman Heather H. Howard said in consulting with the New Jersey State League of Municipalities and other sources, the view was overwhelming that the administrator should be the “appropriate authority.”

   ”And universally without any equivocation, all of them said it should be the administrator,” Mayor Lempert said at a press conference earlier Monday before the meeting.

   Prior to consolidation, Mayor Lempert and the four other members of the Township Committee acted as the appropriate authority over the police. Mayor Lempert was asked what was wrong with that arrangement.

   ”As a new government, I try not to view things as ‘how did we do it in the township? Let’s do it that way,’” Mayor Lempert said. “And I would hope my colleagues from the borough aren’t saying, ‘This is the way we did it in the borough. This is how we should do it now.’”

 


PRINCETON: police oversight

Mayor Liz Lempert cast the tie-breaking vote Monday to back a measure that gives the town’s municipal administrator the civilian oversight of the Princeton Police Department.

   Mayor Lempert, speaking prior to voting for the first time as mayor, expressed disappointment that the divided Princeton Council could not reach consensus on an issue that officials had been debating for a while.

   She and council members Bernard P. Miller, Lance Liverman and Heather H. Howard were against giving that oversight to the mayor and council. The ordinance they supported, one that puts that authority in the hands of the town administrator, needs to come up for a public hearing Sept. 23 and be followed by a vote to adopt it.

   The slender 4-3 margin of Monday’s decision was not a surprise, given the comments officials on both sides of the issue had been making headed into the council meeting. Some officials felt strongly that the council and the mayor should not abdicate their responsibility as the public’s representatives on a matter too critical to delegate to a municipal employee.

   Prior to casting her vote, Councilwoman Jo S. Butler said public safety is “the most important” function that municipal government provides. She expressed deep dissatisfaction with the amount of information-sharing going on about the police force, feeling access has been limited to a select few in government.

   She joined council members Jenny Crumiller and Patrick Simon in opposing the ordinance that makes Administrator Robert W. Bruschi the “appropriate authority,” as it is called.

   On the other hand, some officials felt it important to avoid politicizing the department and thought it made sense to have one person, namely Mr. Bruschi, be the civilian oversight instead of the mayor and the council.

   Councilwoman Heather H. Howard said in consulting with the New Jersey State League of Municipalities and other sources, the view was overwhelming that the administrator should be the “appropriate authority.”

   ”And universally without any equivocation, all of them said it should be the administrator,” Mayor Lempert said at a press conference earlier Monday before the meeting.

   Prior to consolidation, Mayor Lempert and the four other members of the Township Committee acted as the appropriate authority over the police. Mayor Lempert was asked what was wrong with that arrangement.

   ”As a new government, I try not to view things as ‘how did we do it in the township? Let’s do it that way,’” Mayor Lempert said. “And I would hope my colleagues from the borough aren’t saying, ‘This is the way we did it in the borough. This is how we should do it now.’”

 


NYPD Monitor Plan Prompts Police Unions To Fight Against Oversight

NEW YORK — New York City's police unions are seeking to stop a federal monitor from overseeing the NYPD.

The Patrolmen's Benevolent Association filed motions Thursday in Manhattan federal court on behalf of four police unions, and the Sergeant's Benevolent Association filed separately.
They took the first steps to appeal a federal judge's decision last month on the department's stop and frisk policy and are asking the court to intervene in the case.
Police have stopped, questioned and sometimes patted down about 5 million people over the past decade. The judge ruled that the policy violated the civil rights of hundreds of thousands of black and Hispanic men. She ordered a monitor to oversee changes to the policy including officer training, supervision, and paperwork.
If the motions are granted, they unions say they will allow them to have an active role in the appeal and any changes that come.
"Police officers, detectives, lieutenants and captains are the boots on the ground in the fight against crime and terrorism," said Patrick Lynch, president of the patrolmen's union, the largest in the country. "The establishment of a federal monitor may directly impact our members' safety, day-to-day responsibilities, and collective bargaining and other rights. So we believe that we should have standing to participate in arguing the appeal in order to protect those rights."
The police officers say in court papers that some of the changes proposed by the judge are not feasible for officers, and may lead to hastily-drafted accounts of encounters that could result in omissions and errors. Those problems could affect the officer down the road.


Task force on police oversight may grow


ALBUQUERQUE (KRQE) - Two Albuquerque city councilors want to expand a new group tasked with improving the commission that polices the police.
The Police Oversight Commission looks at citizen complaints against police officers, but some say it has no teeth.
So city councilors approved a plan and seated an 11-member task force made up of community members, retired cops and representatives of nonprofit groups to try and fix the problems.
On Friday Councilors Brad Winter and Rey Garduño said they plan on introducing legislation next month to add four more members to make the task force more diverse.



NYC Lawmakers Override Bloomberg On Police Oversight



New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg speaks at a news conference with New York Police Department Commissioner Ray Kelly last week.
Originally published on Thu August 22, 2013 7:30 pm
New York's City Council has approved a new layer of oversight for the nation's largest police force, overriding Mayor Michael Bloomberg weeks after the NYPD's stop-and-frisk tactics were deemed "indirect racial profiling" of blacks and Latinos.
NPR's Joel Rose reports that the council voted to override Bloomberg's veto and pass two police oversight bills: one that would create an inspector general for the NYPD and another that would make it easier to sue for racial profiling.
City Council Speaker Christine Quinn said most individuals being stopped by the police are not doing anything wrong. "People who were not arrested. Charged with no crimes. That is a practice that is unconstitutional and must come to an end," Quinn said.
Joel says Quinn, who is running for mayor, voted for the bill to create an inspector general overseeing the NYPD but against the second bill making it easier for individuals to sue for racial profiling.
NAACP President Ben Jealous hailed the vote to approve the two measures despite the mayor's veto as an important step in ending racial profiling.
"What happens in NYC has consequences for the nation," Jealous said. "The policies of the NYPD inspire the policies and practices of police departments across the nation."
Last week, U.S. District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin ruled that police had been systematically stopping people in the street without any evidence or reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing in what amounted to racial profiling.


No Minneapolis cops have been disciplined after 439 complaints



Of 439 cases involving Minneapolis police misconduct handled by a new office created last fall, not one so far has resulted in discipline of a police officer.
Police department officials say those numbers obscure gains made in responding to citizen complaints about police behavior, but skeptics say the few cases of actual discipline confirm that the new system is not working any better than the one it replaced.
“I believe there has been considerable progress,” said Medaria Arradondo, commander of police internal affairs, who reviews complaints along with Michael Browne, director of the new conduct review office.
“The criticism was that it would not improve process and lead to less discipline,” said Teresa Nelson, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota. “The numbers show that those criticisms were accurate.”
The question of how Minneapolis police disciplines its own is facing fresh scrutiny after several recent incidents involving Minneapolis police officers. Two of the incidents involved off-duty officers accused of fighting with black men and using racial slurs in Green Bay, Wis., and Apple Valley, and led Police Chief Janeé Harteau to convene a citizens advisory group this summer.
In addition, the city of Minneapolis made $14 million in payouts for alleged police misconduct between 2006 and 2012, but the Minneapolis Police Department rarely concluded that the officers involved in those cases did anything wrong, according to a Star Tribune analysis.
In the past, complaints against police could be lodged with the Police Civilian Review Authority (CRA). The CRA board had criticized then-Police Chief Tim Dolan for failing to impose discipline it had recommended. The CRA was dismantled in 2012 and replaced with the Office of Police Conduct Review by the Minneapolis City Council.
Under the new system Arradondo and Browne reviewed 439 cases and sent 17 of them to a conduct review panel to see if discipline was warranted. A big group of cases was dismissed because they were older than 270 days.
All 17 cases that were forwarded involved incidents initially reported to the old CRA.
The new review panel, consisting of two police lieutenants and two citizens appointed by the City Council, decided seven of the 17 cases merited possible discipline and forwarded its findings to Harteau.
Assistant Chief Matt Clark concluded that five of the seven were “nondisciplinary violations” and only eligible for coaching. That left two for Harteau for possible discipline. She has yet to rule on them.
Harteau is on vacation and unavailable, her office said.
Arradondo said he was barred by the state Data Practices Act from giving details of the five cases that Clark found were not subject to discipline.
99 cases sent for coaching
Both Arradondo and Browne say it’s too early to judge the new office, which consists of two civilian investigators and seven investigators who are police officers. A complainant can request a civilian investigator.
Browne said the office had taken big steps in clearing the backlog of CRA cases.
He said a major change is that the office sent 99 complaints involving minor violations to the precincts, where supervisors coach officers to improve their interactions with the public.
Arradondo said the complaint process has been streamlined but said, “we still have a lot of work to do to improve upon, both in the areas of building public confidence in the process and infrastructure in terms of staffing.”
Indeed, the lack of discipline resulting from the 439 cases has raised eyebrows.
“It certainly would raise red flags about the objectivity of the office,” said Brian Buchner, vice president of the National Association of Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement. “People should be asking questions and the council should be asking questions about whether it’s effective … Any time you have as significant a revamping as has been done in Minneapolis, the decisionmakers have an obligation to evaluate the impact.”
While he does not dismiss the role of discipline, Browne said the focus on coaching officers is designed to change police culture. Among the complaints referred for coaching are accusations that officers were rude, he said.
Browne said he wants officers to think about “garnering respect of the community, not because of the discipline, but what is best for society. … If you only use the hammer you aren’t using all the tools in the toolbox to effect the change.”
Slurs against a protected class, be it race, gender or sexual orientation, are not minor violations and are subject to discipline.
‘Police-dominated process’
Samuel Walker, professor emeritus at the University Nebraska Omaha and author of two books on police accountability, said coaching “has a lot of merit to it.”
But he said it was “troubling” there had been no discipline. “I am disturbed about that and that it is a police-dominated process with citizen input.”
Both Walker and the Minnesota ACLU’s Nelson endorsed Buchner’s call for an independent review of the new office.
Ron Edwards, a longtime civil rights activist, said the data show that cases get “filtered” out before reaching Harteau. “I don’t think citizens are getting much for their dollar,” he said.
Another layer of oversight is coming. A new Police Conduct Oversight Commission consisting of seven civilians appointed by the mayor and City Council will routinely audit the way complaints are handled. “With input from the commission, the process will continue to be evaluated for effectiveness and additional changes will be proposed to the mayor and City Council when warranted,” according to the city’s website.
The Internal Affairs Unit investigates other complaints that do not go through the conduct review office. In 2012, 29 officers were sent to supervisors for coaching, 11 got reprimand letters, four were suspended and three were terminated.
In 2013, only 25 cases, aside from the police oversight unit, were investigated by Internal Affairs, leading to one reprimand letter and one suspension, Arradondo said. He attributed the smaller number of cases to coaching.
None of the cases filed since the oversight office opened has gone to the review panel. In September four more citizens will be added to the panel after a City Council hearing.
“We’re still putting in elements,” said Browne, who said cases now move more swiftly and can be tracked far better. “Next year we will have comparative data and we can look at different trends,” he said.