The Fairfax County Police are out of control and need oversight but are slick enough to organize "Campaign contributions" during election time to avoid it.

Teaneck mayor calls for civilian board to review complaints against police



BY JIM NORMAN

As the township of Teaneck commemorated the 50th anniversary of peaceful desegregation of its public schools, the mayor took another page from the civil rights era by calling for the creation of a civilian complaint review board.
His call for a review board dealt with the hottest issue to hit Teaneck in years: the arrest of 63 students who were carrying out what they called a “senior prank” against the high school.
Although the police laid out a description of ransacking that went beyond the definition of prank, the community and school administrators countered that no damage had been done. And students said they had been mistreated by the police officers who took them into custody.
On Monday night, the day before municipal elections, Mayor Mohammed Hameeduddin promised an angry crowd of about 50 residents, high school students, parents and teachers that he would introduce a measure at the next municipal council meeting to reinstitute a civilian complaint review board.
Hameeduddin, who is not up for re-election this year, made the promise after listening to descriptions of the early morning prank that left halls in the high school filled with balloons and Silly String, some door knobs smeared with Vaseline and desks and tables overturned.
Requests to create a government-sanctioned body in Teaneck to monitor police are not new.
After a white police officer fatally shot a black teenager in 1990 – and set off months of racial turmoil that included marches through town led by the Rev. Al Sharpton – Teaneck established a civilian complaint review board to review police activity. The board was established amid widespread concerns that police singled out young black men for harassment.
But after several years of meetings, the board never brought any complaints to the township council for review. The Bergen County prosecutor, as well as the state Attorney General’s office, also reviewed policies and procedures by the Teaneck police and ruled that there was no explicit evidence of harassment of African-Americans.
The Teaneck police, however, embarked on a reform movement that included increased focus on community policing and recruitment of more minority officers.
That review board, called the Teaneck Community Policing Bureau, was disbanded in 2010 as a result of budget cuts. Hameeduddin said it had been discontinued for lack of interest, with no volunteers to fill its positions.
Controversy often accompanies civilian complaint review boards, which came into use in the 1960s. Supporters say that police agencies cannot be objective when they investigate allegations of misconduct against their officers, Dean J. Champion writes in his book "Police Misconduct in America: A Reference Handbook" (ABC-CLIO, 2001). They also say that independent citizen boards can clear officers of charges of misconduct. But, Champion adds, opponents of the boards say that civilians cannot appreciate the high level of risk associated with police work, do not understand the necessity of using force to subdue suspects and are biased against police officers who are accused of misconduct.
Many people in the crowd Monday night angrily charged that the police had overreacted to what has become a tradition in recent years, of seniors going into the high school and making their mark with good-natured mischief.
Acting Police Chief Robert Carney held a press conference the morning after the arrests, claiming that students had destroyed furniture and defecated and urinated in the hallways, a charge angrily denied by students, their parents and several teachers in the audience.
Schools Superintendent Barbara Pinsak also denied that any urination or defecation had taken place and said there was no damage – just a mess that took two hours to clean up.
Twenty-four of those arrested had passed their 18th birthdays and were charged as adults with burglary and vandalism.
Hameeduddin said he had asked three times to see the actual police report, which is cited in the criminal complaints as the basis for the charges, but had been denied each time. “I’ve been told that it’s an ongoing investigation and it’s classified and I can’t see the police report,” the mayor said.
Hameeduddin also said he was waiting to see security camera video recordings to see if they supported the police version of events.
Some students said they had been thrown to the ground by police from Teaneck and as many as 15 different surrounding communities, called to the scene by Teaneck police officials who said they feared the situation was getting out of control.
Handcuffed and held in cells at police headquarters, the students said they were wet, cold, hungry and afraid, and not allowed to call their parents for several hours. One student, 18-year-old Dejanee Archbold, who was charged as an adult, said a detective “came in with coffee and a bagel and called us a bunch of dumbasses.”
Another student, Maya Stripling, also 18, said police at no point advised students of their rights, a requirement when a suspect is arrested on a criminal charge.
Hameeduddin asked for patience while the charges are allowed to go through Bergen County Prosecutor John Molinelli’s office. “My main concern right now is getting them out of the county prosecutor’s office and move it back to municipal court,” he said.
“We all know about procedure,” shouted Isaac Combs, who said he was a parent. “But what about rights?”
Another parent, Claudia Montoya, who said her child was a high school student but not a senior and not involved in the prank, suggested that the group form a committee to file a complaint with the U.S. Department of Justice.
“We’re talking about civil rights here,” another parent shouted as the meeting heated up. “This is why I can’t support a celebration of 50 years of integration in Teaneck. We still have the problem.”
Patricia Butler, a parent whose daughter graduated in 2012, was the organizer of the meeting. She said she was “outraged that these kids were traumatized this way, and the next day they were told not to talk about it.”
Patricia Butler, a parent whose daughter graduated in 2012, was the organizer of the meeting. She said she was “outraged that these kids were traumatized this way, and the next day they were told not to talk about it.”
“All our kids were traumatized by this,” she said. “How dare you violate me and tell me I can’t talk about it?”
Across town, at the high school were people were celebrating the 50th anniversary of voluntary integration in Teaneck, Barbara Toffler, a former councilwoman and frequent critic of the mayor and the majority on the council, said she thought a civilian complaint review board was not a good idea.
“I think that what we have here is two very angry groups – the students, whose programs have been cut, and the police, who have lost officers and equipment to budget cuts,” Toffler said. “And I think that the police calling outside departments in to help was a way of making the point that they are being shortchanged.”
Olivia Betances, a teacher and dean of students at the high school, said she had arrived at the school at 4:30 a.m., and found only balloons, toilet paper streamers and a brownish substance “that looked like hair grease on one tiny area of a locker that police were taking pictures of.”
By 6 a.m., she said, “the entire building was spotless and the school was ready to be opened.”
“My living room was probably dirtier than that building at 6 a.m.,” she said. Betances added that the 2012 prank had taken “way more time to clean up,” and said that when she was a high school student in the Bronx “our senior prank was 90 times worse than this.”
Mike Kelly and Carla Baranauckas contributed to this report.